error standard造句
例句與造句
- The Ninth Circuit applied the clear error standard to review the district court s decision.
- The Seventh Circuit reviewed the District Court's determination of probable cause on a deferential clear error standard and affirmed the conviction.
- The issue in Brecht involved a choice of substantive harmless-error standards : the stricter Chapman, or the less strict Kotteakos, measure of harmlessness.
- Therefore, under the new Brecht harmless error standard, we must inquire whether the testimony had a ` substantial and injurious effect or influence'on the verdict.
- Moreover, precedent suggests that civil and criminal harmless-error standards do not differ in their treatment of grave doubt as to the harmlessness of errors affecting substantial rights.
- It's difficult to find error standard in a sentence. 用error standard造句挺難的
- Because Benitez did not object to the District Court's failure prior to his conviction, the error was not preserved for appeal and so was reviewed under the plain error standard of Fed.
- Gascon J, writing for the majority, held that the Quebec Court of Appeal had erred by conflating the judicial review standard of correctness and the appellate standard of palpable and overriding error standard.
- The clear error standard is highly deferential and is only met when the reviewing court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed by the district court.
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ordinarily applies an abuse of discretion standard of review in reference to sentencing decisions, but applies a higher plain error standard when no timely objection to a condition was raised in District Court.
- Third, contrary to the Fifth Circuit's assumption, once a reviewing court applying Bagley has found constitutional error, there is no need for further harmless-error review, since the constitutional standard for materiality under Bagley imposes a higher burden than the harmless-error standard of Brecht v . Abrahamson, 507 U . S .---,-- -.
- Rather, he carefully explained his view that the federal claim differed from the state claim because it was governed by the harmless-error standard in Chapman v . California, 386 U . S . 18 ( 1967 ), rather than a California standard similar to Brecht v . Abrahamson, 507 U . S .---( 1993 ).
- We must concede that in Brecht v . Abrahamson this Court, in the course of holding that the more lenient Kotteakos harmless-error standard, rather than the stricter Chapman standard, normally governs cases of habeas review of constitutional trial errors, stated that habeas petitioners " are not entitled to habeas relief based on trial error unless they can establish that it resulted in ` actual prejudice . "'